WP3
Article Summary
The scholarly article
“Teaching Punctuation as a Rhetorical Tool” by John Dawkins describes the rules
and significance of punctuation as a rhetorical tool. Dawkins further explains
the flexibility that punctuation allows and presents a new idea called
functional punctuation: an idea that focuses on punctuating according to
meaning and rhetorical situations rather than by grammatical rules. Similar to
how genres and rhetorical conventions change based on an intended audience,
punctuation changes based on how you want to present your ideas. Dawkins explains
that the way each writer chooses to use a specific punctuation mark is entirely
based on what they are trying to imply.
Dawkins also explains that
this form of punctuation is used to clarify our meaning and gain appropriate
emphasis. For example, one could write “Today John went to school.” Another way
this could be written is, “Today, John went to school.” That being said, in the
second example, the author would be choosing to add the comma, placing a pause
after the word “today.” Although the sentences don’t differ much, there is a
difference in the way the information was presented. Adding the comma affects
the flow of the sentence and how one would read the sentence. Dawkins believes
that functional punctuation is very beneficial, as it encourages students to
analyze their rhetorical intentions and meaning. Likewise, this approach to
punctuating is key to enforcing the idea that writing is thinking.
WP3:
Transformation to younger audience
Genre:
Children’s song
Punctuation Jam
Chorus:
Punctuation
marks,
They make
your writing smart
If
you want your writing to glow,
use
punctuation to make it flow.
Whether you’re writing for school or just to correspond,
without punctuation, your sentences will go on and on and on.
Don’t forget that punctuation,
will keep your meaning clear in any situation.
Periods are the first punctuation mark,
use it to end every sentence before another can start.
A period implies a full stop,
It’s simple, all you have to do is make a dot.
[Chorus]
Next is the comma, we use it a lot
use it to separate a list of things you bought.
You can also think of is as a pause,
use it when you want to connect an independent clause.
Then there is the colon, used in a few situations:
before an example, a list and sometimes before quotations.
A colon consists of two dots,
use it to express your thoughts.
Then comes the semi colon, which can be hard to understand
use it to join two sentences with no “and”.
Remember, if you get confused,
it will be the semi colon rather than “and” used.
[Chorus]
At last we have the dash, used to emphasize
or in other words to -- intensify.
We can also use the dash to separate thoughts,
don’t overthink if or you might get lost.
Don’t forget this song; it will make you smart.
Punctuation’s not too hard: soon you’ll know it by heart.
Genre:
Teacher’s lesson plan
Date: 3/6/16 Lesson: Punctuation:
As a Rhetorical Tool
Class: Intro
to Writing
|
Learning
Context
|
Learning
Goal
|
Learning
Development
|
Learning
Activity
|
Learning
Evaluation
|
|
An advanced level
writing course; a unit on punctuation
as a rhetorical tool.
|
By the end of the
lesson, students will be able to recognize and employ multiple uses of
punctuation marks, based on rhetorical situations.
|
Write sentences on whiteboard and
call on students to come up and write the punctuation where they think it
should go. Go over answers with class.
|
*Quiz
|
|
|
|
|
20 min
|
30 min
|
10 min
|
Notes:
·
Remind students that quizzes will be
graded and uploaded by next class
·
Remind students that PB1A is due next
class
·
Hand out updated syllabus
·
Remind students how to post PB to blog
WP3 Follow Up Self-Analysis
The article “Teaching Punctuation as a
Rhetorical Tool” by John Dawkins describes the
rules and regulations and the value and significance of punctuation in writing.
Dawkins further explains the flexibility that punctuation allows and presents a
new idea called functional punctuation: an idea that focuses on punctuating
according to meaning and rhetorical situations rather than by grammatical
rules. Just as Losh and Alexander claim that “rhetoric is about saying the
right thing at the right time”, the idea of functional punctuation claims that
this form of punctuation is about using the right marks at the right time,
depending on the situation. From this scholarly article, I transformed the
material into two new genres. Using my own moves and prior knowledge on “how to
communicate effectively with different communities”, I turned one into a genre
for a younger audience and one into a genre for an older audience (Losh and
Alexander).
To turn the material presented in
this scholarly article into a genre for children, I decided to change it into a
children’s song. My goal for this piece was to teach a lesson on punctuation in
a way that could be easily understood by and engaging to a child, specifically
between the ages of 7-9. While trying to transform the scholarly article into a
song, there were many questions I had to ask myself. I had to ask myself what
aspects of the piece (if not the whole piece) would I focus on in the song, how
would I break down the concepts into simpler terms, and how would I keep the
attention of the child, all while following the conventions of a children’s
song.
To start, I knew I had to pick a specific
aspect of the scholarly article to choose from, as it would be nearly
impossible to translate 17 pages of text into a song. I thought to myself, what
are the most basic concepts that I could pull from the article and did just
that. Rather than focusing on the abstract main idea of functional punctuation
presented in the article, I focused on the basic punctuation marks and their
functions. As children are not used to digesting advanced language and
concepts, I wanted to make it as simple as possible so that they could best
understand. To keep their attention, I used rhymes, as most children songs do.
I created a chorus, as I wanted something that could be repeated and hopefully
stick in their minds. I also tried to make the song visually pleasing (on
paper) because bright colors and pictures are huge attention grabbers to
children. One thing I decided to do differently than many authors of children’s
songs was to include punctuation in the lyrics. I noticed many children’s song
lyrics lacked basic punctuation marks and because my song is on the topic of
punctuation I though it would be a great way for readers to see the marks I was
teaching them in use. As many people are visual learners, just using the
punctuation in the lyrics could help kids learn how to actually use the
punctuation correctly. The tone of this song is playful and happy, a tone that
I feel suits the needs of a child audience very well.
To turn this scholarly article into a
genre for adults, I decided to make a teacher’s lesson plan. My goal for this
piece was to prepare a lesson plan on “Punctuation as a Rhetorical Tool” that
any teacher could use to teach college freshmen students (young adults)
Dawkin’s new theory of functional punctuation.
I chose this age group because this is when I first learned about the
idea of functional punctuation and feel that others, like myself, would benefit
from learning this too. When transforming this material into a lesson plan, I
had to ask myself what was the best way to present the information and what
aspects of the article I was going to use, all while following the conventions
of a lesson plan.
As I don’t have
any experience with writing lesson plans, I had to do much research to find the
conventions that make it one. That being said, I’d agree with Losh and
Alexander when they say that “adopting an identity can be about doing real
research—not just putting on a costume.” After researching for a while, I found
that lesson plans come in many different forms whether it be daily, weekly,
monthly, ect. I decided to do a daily lesson plan, as I figured that I would be
able to teach students this topic in one lesson. When it came to formatting the
actual lesson plan, I used a combination of many other templates I had seen. I
made a diagram with 5 columns consisting of the headings “Learning Context”, “Learning
Goal”, “Learning Development”, “Learning Activity”, and “Learning Evaluation”.
I specifically chose those five headings because from all the lesson plans I
saw, I felt that those were the most important aspects to a lesson plan. Under
the first two headings, I gave a brief summary of the context that would be
taught in the lesson and the goals of the lesson. In the “learning development”
column, I wrote “*power point”. For learning development, which is the actual
teaching of the lesson, I made a power point explaining the abstract concept
and gave diagrams to help students understand. In the power point, I decided
not to include in depth explanations of the material, as teachers usually put
simple information on power points and then use their own knowledge on the
topic to further explain. In the “learning activity column” I wrote down a
simple activity that I would have the students do in class and in the “learning
evaluation” column I wrote “*quiz”. To evaluate students and understand how
well they grasped the material I taught them, I made a very brief quiz with a
few questions that correlate directly to the power point. I also made a key
with the answers and explanations as to why the answers are correct. According
to Losh and Alexander, “sometimes you may want to show your deep understanding
of your subject.” I felt that this was particularly relatable in this situation
as a teacher holds more authority and should know the material they are
teaching very well. In this lesson plan, I kept a professional tone throughout
it and used advanced vocabulary to support the needs of my adult audience.
During this
project, when it came to appealing to an older and younger audience, I had to
“[create] a completely different rhetorical effect” for each one. For the child
audience, the tone was light and cheery, the concepts were simple, and the
rhetoric was visually pleasing. In contrast, for the adult audience, the tone
was professional and scholarly, the concepts and diction were abstract, and the
rhetoric was professionally designed using charts and a power point, along with
much less color. When creating the new genre for children and adults, I tried
to “morph [myself] and [my] writing to fit [the two] different subjects [and]
situations”. This allowed me to best understand how to present my ideas to
appeal to each specific audience.
Although
planning and executing this project took a lot of time and effort, it forced
students, including myself, to get creative. This was a very abstract project
and at first it was hard to comprehend but with practice and more explanation,
it became easier to understand and better yet, it became exciting to create.
With this project I was definitely challenged a few times, but it only made me
grow as a writer. I had to make revisions quite a few times to make everything
flow, but overall I’d say I enjoyed the freedom that we had with this project.
It allowed us to be ourselves and express a part of our creative mind that few
other writing projects allow.
Works Cited
Dawkins, John. "Teaching Punctuation
as a Rhetorical Tool." College Composition and Communication 46.4
(1995): 533-48. JStor. National Council of Teachers of English.
Web. 23 Feb. 2016.
Losh, Elizabeth M., and Johnathan
Alexander. “Writing Identities.” Understanding Rhetoric: A Graphic Guide to
Writing. 114-139. Print.
No comments:
Post a Comment